Legal Opinion

Moore v. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1922No. 795PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Quinn, J.

This is an agreed ease on the facts. They show:(1) That on December 29, 1919, the Mardez Lumber Company was operating a sawmill at Benford, Tex., and on said date was a subscriber to the Employers’ Liability Act (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. Supp. 1918, arts. 5246 — 1 to 5246 — 91), carrying a policy of insurance with the Lumbermen’s Reciprocal Association, appellee herein. On said date Pete Sanders was an employé of said Mardez Lumber Company, and was covered by said policy of insurance, and on said date sustained injuries in the course of his employment, resulting in his immediate death. Minnie…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Burns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Selden v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Bartoni's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Murphy's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Ray v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1917

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bassett v. Stratford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Moore v. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'nTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  3. Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. DappermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Opinion No. (2000), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API