Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Strozewski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 31, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCasey, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 26, 1984, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that claimant lost his employment as a security guard due to misconduct for having failed to punch time clocks during his rounds, despite prior warnings that he was required to do so. Since the record contains evidence that on the date in question claimant failed to punch the time clocks for a three-hour period, evidence which the Board…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of WaiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Park Ten Associates v. City of New York Department of FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API