Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1996No. 95-2529PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. ShawOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. MasonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. Medina County Bar Ass'n v. CarlsonOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. BaldwinOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. CorbinOhio Supreme Court · 2006