Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1996No. 95-2529PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. ShawOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. MasonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Medina County Bar Ass'n v. CarlsonOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BaldwinOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Dayton Bar Ass'n v. CorbinOhio Supreme Court · 2006