Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Allard v. Frech
Texas Supreme Court
Decided May 4, 1988No. C-6863Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSpears, Justice
The dissenting and concurring opinion delivered May 4,1988 is withdrawn and the following is substituted:
Billy Allard was employed by General Dynamics Corporation for thirty-one years. During his lengthy employment with the company, he made regular contributions to a qualified retirement plan and earned the right to receive monthly retirement benefits of $1,008 for the remainder of his life. Mr. Allard began receiving his retirement benefits in June, 1982, but upon Mrs. Al-lard’s death in 1983, her estate claimed one-half of Mr. Allard’s retirement benefits. The majority holds that the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kalb v. FeuersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Free v. BlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Farley v. MM Cattle CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.