Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Fox

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1904No. 1,966PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; D. W. Harney, Judge.- ’ ' ■ Action by Joe V. Harmon against J. F. Fox. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

MR. COMMISSIONER POORMAN

prepared for the court the following opinion:

This is an appeal from a judgment, and from an order overruling defendant’s motion for a new trial.

*3251. The complaint is in two counts, and alleges, substantially, in the first count:

First. That plaintiff granted to defendant the exclusive privilege of selling certain articles of merchandise at the Butte race track for a period of forty-three days, and that defendant promised and agreed in writing to pay the sum of $550 therefor, payable in installments; the last payment to be $185 on August 25, 1901.

Second. That defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grogan v. Valley Trading Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Eans' Adm'r v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  3. Russell v. ClappNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Baysinger v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Duzan v. MeserveOregon Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stephens v. ConleyMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Daily v. MarshallMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Rogers v. RogersMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Sevanin v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Murphy v. JohnsMontana Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API