Legal Opinion

People v. Lark

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 28, 1984No. 82—2783, 82—2784 consPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

Following a jury trial, defendants George Lark and Tommie McKinnie were each convicted of three counts of armed robbery (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 38, par. 18—2), and sentences were imposed on all three counts. Lark challenges his conviction on grounds that a suggestive lineup led to his mistaken identification in court, improper testimony concerning his criminal record deprived him of a fair trial, and the trial court erred in dealing with a juror who dissented from the verdict. McKinnie joins in the last of Lark’s contentions, and claims further that improper comment in closing argument…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. PickettIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. CarlsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. PrimIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. ManionIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. BaptistIllinois Supreme Court · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. MorissetteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. People v. NightengaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. Bianchi v. MikhailAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. People v. HardinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. People v. GunnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API