Gee v. Culver
Oregon Supreme Court
Multnomah County. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.
This is an action for malicious prosecution. The complaint is in the ordinary form. The answer denies that the prosecution was instituted maliciously or without probable cause. The case was in this court on appeal at the last term, and was reversed for error of the court below in giving certain instructions excepted to by the appellant. '
It appears by the bill of exceptions that the court, after having instructed the jury as to what would constitute probable cause, and that both want of probable cause and malice must concur before the action can be maintained, gave the jury the following…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Culbertson v. CabeenTexas Supreme Court · 1867
- Barron v. MasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
- Mitchell v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Ritchey v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
- Pullen v. GliddenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wallace v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Stamper v. RaymondOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Downing v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Roberts v. CohenOregon Supreme Court · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.