In Re Estate of Enyart
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.
Contestants appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
This action involves the last will and testament and a codicil thereto of Katherine Enyart, both of which instruments were ad mitted to probate. Contestants severally filed objections to the allowance of the same on three alleged grounds: (1) Failure to comply with the statutory requirements for testamentary execution (this objection was later abandoned) ; (2) mental incapacity of testatrix to execute the will; (8) undue influence exerted by two beneficiaries, Sarah A. Jordan and Alex E. Jordan, her husband.
After a hearing…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schmidt v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- In Re Estate of OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Sturtevant v. SturtevantOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Foster v. DearbornSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Spratt v. SprattMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Estate of WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Carter v. First Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- In Re Estate of JenksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Blank v. KramerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- In Re Estate of ReilandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.