Legal Opinion

State v. Cities Service Company

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 10, 1922PublishedCited by 29 opinions

January Term, 1922. Error to Superior Court for New Castle County.

1Opinion of the Court

Wolcott, Chancellor, delivering the opinion of the court, after making the foregoing statement:

In this state, the return to the alternative writ is conclusive and is to be taken as true for the purpose of the case. State ex rel. Brumley v. J. & M. Paper Co., 1 Boyce, 379, 77 Atl. 16, 30 L. R. A. (N. S.) 290. So also are all the allegations in the alternative writ which are not denied in the return. Bay State Gas Co. et al. v. Content & Co., 4 Pennewill, 238, 56 Atl. 1114.

The plaintiff in error contends (1) that by virtue of the provisions of section 29 of the General Corporation Law, he has…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Stone v. KelloggIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Foster v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Venner v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Johnson v. LangdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. State Ex Rel. Brumley v. Jessup & Moore Paper Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1910

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. General Time Corporation v. Talley Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  2. State v. Loft, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1931
  3. Harden v. Eastern States Public Service Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  4. EL Bruce Company v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
  5. Shaw v. Agri-Mark, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API