Legal Opinion

AT&T Resource Management Corp. v. Building Technology Engineers, Inc.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided June 26, 1992Published

1Opinion of the CourtDougan, J.

In this action the plaintiff, AT&T Resource Management Corporation (“AT&T’), sought to recover the sum of $21,512.75 from the defendants, Building Technology Engineers, Inc. (“BTE”) Codman Company, Inc. (“CCI”) and 45 Milk Street Corporation (“45 Milk Street”) for damage to a computer owned by AT&T.

The answers of all defendants denied negligence and claimed that any damage was caused by the negligence of a third party or AT&T; CCI and 45 Milk Street together cross-claimed against BTE for indemnity and BTE counter-cross-claimed on the same grounds.

Following a trial before Pino, J. on June 7,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marquis v. GalastiMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1982
  2. Arciero v. Eagle Realty Associates, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1982
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. DanielMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
  4. Gurney v. McIntires Dairy, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1972
  5. New England Rehabilitation Hospital, Inc. v. HorganMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API