Legal Opinion

Graham v. Somerville Construction Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1953No. Docket 33, Calendar 45,533PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

The material facts in this case are not in' dispute. In July, 1950, the defendant Somerville Construction Company was engaged in the construction of a pipe line for the transmission of gas between Vermontville and Mulliken, a distance of approximately 10 miles. Defendant’s employee, Ernest Graham, was in immediate charge of the work as job superintendent. A crew of between 35 and 40 men were employed in the laying of the pipe line, and equipment adapted to the necessary work to be done was used.

It was the duty of the superintendent to supervise the project, including the performance of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Daniel v. Murray Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Appleford v. KimmelMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Murphy v. Flint Bd. of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Morey v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Pearce v. Michigan Home & Training SchoolMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Bowman v. RL COOLSAET CONST. CO.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. James Bowman v. R L Coolsaet Construction CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. McLemore v. M. S. Knee Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API