Legal Opinion
Stoutamire v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 20, 1998No. 97-1075PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
710 So.2d 744 (1998)
John W. STOUTAMIRE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-1075.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 20, 1998.
Appellant, Pro Se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Trisha Meggs, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2Per curiam
The trial court correctly denied appellant's 3.800(a) motion because it did not allege an illegal sentence. Appellant's motion would have been timely filed under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and might have been considered as such by the trial court had the notary's certificate reflected that…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Hall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Staton v. StatonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Zipperer v. SingletaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
4Cited by5 opinions
- Staton v. StatonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Lawson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Lewis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Stoutamire v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Myers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000