Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Posey
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 16, 1967No. Civ. 23980PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRAY, J. *
Defendant and cross-complainant Mary J. Hudson (hereinafter Mary) appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and cross-defendant Pearl D. Hudson (hereinafter Pearl) denying Mary’s claim to retirement benefits •arising from the death of Howard Ellsworth Hudson (hereinafter Howard).
Questions Presented
Did certain language in Howard’s will effect a change of beneficiary under the State Employees’ Retirement System?
Record
Pearl filed a petition for writ of mandate to compel defendant State Employees' Retirement System (hereinafter System), to pay her, as the widow of Howard, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Watenpaugh v. State Teacher's Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Wicktor v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- In re the Estate of BeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Gallaher v. State Teachers' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Lyles v. Teachers Retirement BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Lee v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Ruster v. RusterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Coughlin v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984