Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re L.Z.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 2014Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

PANELLA, J.

I respectfully dissent from the decision of my distinguished colleagues in the Majority. My discussion will be restricted to the Majority’s reversal of the trial court’s finding that Mother, L.F., should be identified as a perpetrator of abuse. I believe sufficient evidence exists to list Mother, who was the primary caretaker, as a perpetrator of the brutal child abuse inflicted upon L.Z.

Instead of viewing each of Child’s injuries in isolation to ascertain whether he suffered a “serious physical injury” necessary to establish child abuse, I would focus on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Interest of J.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. In the Interest of J.R.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. In the Interest of R.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. In re ReadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. In re J.J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API