Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arutunoff v. Oklahoma State Election Board

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 3, 1982No. 81-1379Published

1DissentSeymour, Circuit Judge

I am unable to concur in the majority opinion for the reasons set out below.

The challenged statutes, which took effect in 1975, substantially restrict the ability of a minority party to gain recognized status. Recognition is a legal prerequisite to a party’s ability to place candidates on the ballot for state elections. Prior to 1975, Oklahoma required a new political party to submit a petition containing the names of 5,000 voters in order to field candidates for office. Okla.Stat. tit. 26, § 229 (1971), repealed by 1974 Okla.Sess.Laws eh. 153, § 17-114. Under the new law, the party must…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Illinois State Board of Elections v. Socialist Workers PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Jenness v. FortsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API