Legal Opinion

Engelbert v. Foley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1900Published

Error to Wayne; Carpenter, J. Assumpsit by Henry Engelbert against John S. Eoley and others for services rendered. Erom a judgment for defendant Eoley on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The defendant Eoley, bishop of the diocese of Detroit, was the owner of land in question in this case in the spring of 1891, and is yet the owner. The plaintiff is an architect, and brings suit against defendants to recover for services in making plans and specifications for a parochial residence for the parish of St. Erancis upon the premises owned by Bishop Foley, ,and for making a second set of plans and specifications for the same purpose. The other defendants are-members of the church committee. The claim in plaintiff’s bill of particulars is for the value of such work, $803.33.

It…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Foley v. KleibuschMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API