Legal Opinion

Savanah Bank v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 31, 1923No. 7171Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON REHEARING,

June 27, 1923.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The motion for rehearing is based' upon the court’s refusal to grant a new trial upon the ground of alleged newly discovered evidence. Appellant insists that although the statement of facts heard on the motion for new trial was not filed during the term, the circumstances are such as demand its consideration. The verdict was rendered on the 16th of March; the term of court closed on the 1st of April. The motion for new trial was filed on the 18th of March and an amended motion on the 23rd of that month. Attached to the amended motion was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Hart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Choate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Salazar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API