Bechtel v. Cone
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The ease is stated in the opinion of the Court. Exception.—The testimony having been closed, the plaintiff offered the following eight prayers: 1. That if the jury shall find from the evidence before them, that the plaintiff agreed with the defendant to do the plumbing and gas-fitting work, and furnish the materials necessary therefor in certain houses of the defendant, for a price agreed upon between them, and that he did…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The ease is stated in the opinion of the Court. Exception.—The testimony having been closed, the plaintiff offered the following eight prayers: 1. That if the jury shall find from the evidence before them, that the plaintiff agreed with the defendant to do the plumbing and gas-fitting work, and furnish the materials necessary therefor in certain houses of the defendant, for a price agreed upon between them, and that he did the work and furnished the materials in accordance with his said contract, and that other work not provided for by the…
1Opinion of the CourtIrving, J.
The appellant sued the appellee in the Superior Court of Baltimore City, in an action of assumpsit. The declaration was for goods bargained and sold, work and labor done, and contained the ordinary money counts. The defendant pleaded never indebted,' never promised, payment and set-off. It was admitted that there was a verbal contract between the appellant and appellee, that the appellant should do the plumbing and gas-fitting in ten houses of the appellee, for the sum of two thousand and fifty dollars in money. After making that contract, it appears that another contract was verbally made…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dugan v. GittingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1845
3Cited by2 opinions
- Watts v. WittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
- Scurry v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957