State v. Kriesel

¶1 Thomas Edward Kriesel, Jr., (Kriesel) appeals from the denial by the Tenth Judicial District Court, Fergus County, of his motion to suppress. We affirm.

¶2 The sole issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred in denying Kriesel’s motion to suppress.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

¶3 In January, 1996, Kriesel was placed on probation under a three-year deferred imposition of sentence from the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County. Pursuant to the conditions of his probation, Kriesel was subject to the following provision:

6. The Defendant shall be subject to search and seizure of his…