Legal Opinion

Chicago City Railway Co. v. Pural

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 13, 1906No. Gen. No. 12,583Published

Action on the case for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. George A. Dupuy, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1905.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

The charge of negligence in the declaration is, that while plaintiff was a passenger upon the.Thirty-first street car “ the motormen and conductors wrongfully, negligently, knowingly, improperly and carelessly caused it to be run and moved in an eastern direction at a high rate of speed, wrongfully, carelessly and improperly caused it to g<5 and to be brought into contact with a certain other car running at a high rate of speed in and along said Wentworth avenue in a northern direction, so that the front end of said Went-worth avenue car came in contact and collided with said Thirty-first…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago City Railway Co. v. JenningsIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. West Chicago Street Railroad v. KromshinskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Chicago Union Traction Co. v. YarusIllinois Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API