Josselyn v. Dennehy
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
Eleven pro se inmates appeal from the district court’s rejection of their challenge to a state regulation banning inmates’ receipt of publications that are “sexually explicit” or feature “nudity,” 103 C.M.R. § 481.15(3)(b), and to a policy banning the display of those publications or other “semi-nude, scantily clad, and/or sexually suggestive material” in inmates’ cells, 103 DOC 400.03(2)(c)(l) & (2). For the reasons given by the district court, Moses v. Dennehy, 523 F.Supp.2d 57 (D.Mass.2007), supplemented by the discussion below, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Overton v. BazzettaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Beard v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Reynolds v. QuirosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Dubarry v. CapraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Dubarry v. CapraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- GLADU v. MAGNUSSONDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022
- GLADU v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.