Legal Opinion
Jones Lang LaSalle of New York, LLC v. New York City School Construction Authority
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 2011Published
1Opinion of the Court
*425OPINION OF THE COURT
Emily Jane Goodman, J.
Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint (1) on the ground that the causes of action are time-barred, (2) for failure to state a cause of action for unjust enrichment, and (3) due to lack of standing. This motion is granted as to dismissal of the unjust enrichment claim and is otherwise denied.
Background
Defendant is a public benefit corporation charged with building and maintaining public schools in New York City (complaint 1i 2). In 2005, plaintiff1 and defendant entered into a contract for consulting services (the consulting contract) where…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Elia v. Highland Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Bri-Den Construction Co. v. New York City School Construction AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- D & L Associates, Inc. v. New York City School Construction AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- C.S.A. Contracting Corp. v. New York City School Construction AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004