Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Jones

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided May 30, 1979No. NCM 78 0737Published

1ConcurrenceGladis, Judge

I concur in the result reached by the majority because I find, for the reasons set forth below, that, contrary to the contentions of the accused, the specifications meet the pleading requirements of United States v. Alef, 3 M.J. 414 (C.M.A.1977). In addition, insofar as the attempts to remold the military justice system are contrary to and undermine the clearly expressed intent of Congress, acting pursuant to its constitutional authority, I join my brothers in condemning those attempts.

Sufficiency of the Specifications

A general court-martial with officer members convicted the accused, in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Relford v. Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks, Fort LeavenworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Noyd v. BondSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API