Legal Opinion · Dissent

Doyle v. Dong

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 18, 1992Published

1DissentLiacos, C.J.

The hospital record at issue contains second-level hearsay for which no exception to the rule against hearsay exists. It therefore should not have been admitted in evidence. I dissent.

General Laws c. 233, § 79 (1990 ed.), provides an exception to the hearsay rule for certain hospital records.1 In *690Bouchie v. Murray, 376 Mass. 524, 531 (1978), the court established a four-part test to determine when hospital records are admissible under § 79:

“First, the document must be the type of record contemplated by G. L. c. 233, § 79. Second, the information must be germane to the patient’s treatment or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bouchie v. MurrayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Wingate v. Emery Air Freight Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Peter J. Ricciardi v. The Children's Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. McDonoughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. FranksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API