Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Sanders v. Stockwell

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Tiie action is quo warranto,' brought by the Attorney-General, pursuant to the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, to test the title to the office of city chamberlain of the city of Cortland. ■ The defendant • demurs to the complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a 'cause of action. The facts, are, of course, undisputed and sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtComan, J.

The necessity for an early decision of this case, as represented by all the counsel, prevents ate examination which its importance would otherwise suggest. Nevertheless, I feel satisfied that the conclusion which I have reached would not be changed upon more mature reflection.

In November, 1906, one G. J. Maycumber was elected city chamberlain of the city of Cortland for a term of two years, commencing January 1, 1907, and expiring December 81, 1908.

In December, 1908, the said Maycumber was re-elected to said office for the term of two years, commencing January 1, 1909, and expiring December…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People Ex Rel. Ward v. . ScheuNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mahne v. MahneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. People ex rel. Green v. BlackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API