Skinner v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtKeller, P.J.
MEYERS, PRICE, JOHNSON, KEASLER, HERVEY, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.
At appellant’s trial, some evidence was tested for DNA, and some was not. State and federal district courts have both found that defense counsel had a reasonable trial strategy for not requesting the testing of the untested items. Some of the remaining items were subsequently tested. Appellant now requests testing of items that still remain untested. We hold that, in the usual case, the interests of justice do not require testing when defense counsel has already declined to request testing as a matter of reasonable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Dowthitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Rivera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Skinner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Skinner v. SwitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Ex Parte GutierrezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Swearingen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Skinner v. SwitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Wood v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.