Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 1924No. A-4364PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatson, P. J.

(after stating the facts as« above). It is first contended that the trial court erred in overruling the demurrer to the information. The charging part of the information is as follows:

“That the said W. K. Decker and the said Homer Wilson acting conjointly and together, in the county and state aforesaid, on the 5th day of February, 1921, did knowingly, willfully, unlawfully, wrongfully, feloniously, conjointly, and together, make an assault in and upon one Claude Deshazo with a certain weapon, to wit, a revolver, then and thereby putting the said Claude Deshazo in fear 'of an immediate injury…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Quinn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Wagner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API