City of Flovilla v. McElheney
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Justice.
This is a direct appeal by the city from the trial court’s order declaring the city’s zoning ordinance invalid. This court affirms.
When appellee placed his mobile home on a lot zoned residential, the city brought suit seeking an injunction. The trial court, however, ruled that the city’s 1977 zoning ordinance was invalid because it contained many erroneous references to Butts County and to Butts County officials. The city ordinance had been prepared using the Butts County ordinance as a model and these references had been mistakenly left in the ordinance as adopted by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Foskey v. KirklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- City Council of Augusta v. IrvinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- City of Waycross v. BoatrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Head v. WaldrupSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Waldrop v. Stratton & McLendon, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hollberg v. Spalding CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- East Georgia Land & Development Co. v. Newton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Newton County v. East Georgia Land and Development Co., L.L.C.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- City of Buford v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- City of Buford v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.