Legal Opinion · Dissent

Capital Transit Co. v. Grimes

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 24, 1947No. 9327Published

1DissentEdgerton, Associate Justice

I think the judgment should be affirmed. Since appellant offered no objection, at the trial, to the court’s charge concerning the last clear chance, its correctness is not before us. Yet the last clear chance doctrine is involved in the question that is before us. That question is whether the District Court should have granted appellant’s motion for a directed verdict. I think the court rightly denied the motion.

There was substantial evidence, essential parts of which are not mentioned in the opinion of this court, that the accident was caused by the negligence of the operator of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Alamo v. Del RosarioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. Schear v. LudwigCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API