Legal Opinion

Gauthier v. Westfall

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 2, 1994No. 2-93-0643PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quetsch

Plaintiff, Judith A. Gauthier, appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants, Dr. Charles H. P. Westfall and the Elmhurst Clinic, in her action seeking recovery under a theory of medical malpractice, and from a ruling barring one of her proposed expert witnesses pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 220(b) (134 Ill. 2d R. 220(b)).

We briefly summarize the facts of the case at this point and will supply additional detail as we discuss the issues. In her complaint, plaintiff alleged that in November 1985 Dr. Westfall failed to diagnose and treat plaintiff in accordance with the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Gilbert v. Sycamore Municipal HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Pyne v. WitmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Marsh v. Evangelical Covenant ChurchIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Barth v. ReaganIllinois Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Allegro Services, Ltd. v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Lyon Metal Products, L.L.C. v. Protection Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Tolve v. Ogden Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. Palm v. 2800 Lake Shore Drive Condominium AssociationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  5. Morus v. KapustaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API