Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Garrett v. Sears

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided July 7, 1993No. CA 92-974Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMelvin Mayfield, Judge

I must dissent from the majority opinion on the first issue in this case. That issue is whether the statute of limitations barred appellant’s claim for additional compensation. The statute involved is Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-702(b) (1987), which provides in pertinent part:

In cases where compensation for disability has been paid on account of injury, a claim for additional compensation shall be barred unless filed with the commission within one (1) year from the date of the last payment of compensation, or two years from the date of injury, whichever is greater.

The appellant sustained a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. Scheduled Skyways, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Moss v. El Dorado Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  3. Jones v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Woodard v. ITT Higbie Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Long-Bell Lumber Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API