Legal Opinion
Cox. v. Magers
Montana Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 2018No. DA 17-0227PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice Beth Baker delivered the Opinion of the Court.
¶1 E. Cox and C. Cox filed an action against Glen Magers seeking damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained in an automobile collision. They now appeal the District Court's order dismissing the action with prejudice under M. R. Civ. P. 37(d) due to each plaintiff's failure to fully answer interrogatories or to produce relevant documents during discovery. We affirm.
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
¶2 In February 2010, Magers was driving his pickup truck in downtown Kalispell when he struck the rear of a 1990 Ford Escort driven by C.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Searock, D/B/A Allied Marine v. Greg Stripling, Counter-Claimant-Appellant, Amf Inc., D/B/A Hatteras Yachts and Aetna Insurance Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & SonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Richardson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Owen v. F. A. Buttrey Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
- First Bank (NA)-Billings v. HeidemaMontana Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kalispell Aircraft Co. v. PattersonMontana Supreme Court · 2019
- In re M.B.Montana Supreme Court · 2018
- In re Marriage of Hardman and MooreMontana Supreme Court · 2019
- Marriage of JacksonMontana Supreme Court · 2025
- Moore v. FrostMontana Supreme Court · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.