Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Kuechler

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Travis. Tried below before the Hon. J. P. Richardson. The facts essential to a proper understanding of the opinion are stated in it.

1Opinion of the Court

Gould, Associate Justice.

Freeman brought this suit in Travis county, alleging that J. M. Elliott, of Navarro county, was his employed agent to locate or re-enter for him certain tracts of land in Navarro;- that in fraud of his duty as agent Elliott failed to make the re-entries, but in December, 1872, entered a certificate belonging to another person, on one of the tracts which he had engaged to re-enter for plaintiff, and about the same time fraudulently combined with one Randall of Travis county, to obtain a patent on said fraudulent entry, with whose aid, about February 11, 1873, he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Evans v. MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Finch's heirs v. EdmonsonTexas Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baines v. Mensing Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  2. Hutchison v. R. Hamilton SonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. McLaughlin v. J. P. Shannon & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  4. Lindsey v. State of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  5. Lindsey v. State of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API