Legal Opinion

Maenza v. Letkajornsook

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated June 7, 1989, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

In this personal injury action arising out of an automobile accident, the defendants moved for summary judgment on the ground, inter alia, that the plaintiff did not suffer a "serious injury” as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d). In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Scheer v. KoubekNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Konco v. E.T.C. Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Christianson v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Sundack v. Power Test Petro Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tipping-Cestari v. KilhennyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Jacondino v. LovisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API