Legal Opinion

Burkett v. Newell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 16, 1924No. 6 Div. 116PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

This is a statutory bill to quiet title to a certain vacant lot in the city of Birmingham, filed by appellant against the appellee.

The bill in its allegations met all the statutory requirements. Section 5443 et seq., Code 1907. The answer, however, did not meet the requirements of section 5445 of the Code, in that the respondent did not specify her title, but merely made response by way of the general averment that she was the owner of the property. In eases of this character complainant makes out a prima facie case by proof of peaceable possession and that no suit was pending, so as to cast…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cooper v. SlaughterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Kendrick v. ColyarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  3. Whittaker v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. W. B. Paterson Lumber Co. v. PatrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Higdon v. KennemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Grayson v. MuckleroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Stewart v. ChildressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Ward v. ChamblessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. St. Clair Springs Hotel Co. v. BalcombSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Coffman v. FoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API