Legal Opinion
Gersten v. Intrinsic Technologies, LLP
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 14, 2006No. 05 C 5403PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FILIP, District Judge.
Defendants, Intrinsic Technologies, LLC (“Intrinsic” or “Company”), Thomas La-Mantia (“LaMantia”), and Richard P.L. Schendelman (“Schendelman”) (collectively “Defendants”), have moved to stay proceedings pending arbitration pursuant to the stay provision of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 3. (D.E.14.) 1 For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
Intrinsic is an information technology consulting company that was founded by LaMantia and Schendelman in 1997. (D.E. 8 (1st Am.Cmplt.) ¶ 14; D.E. 13 ¶ 3, 15.) In January…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- International Paper Company v. Schwabedissen Maschinen & Anlagen GmbhCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Paragon Micro, Inc. v. BundyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- ChampionsWorld, LLC v. United States Soccer Federation, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Wood v. Penntex Resources, L.P.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- Contract Services Group, LLC v. E&E Manufacturing of Tennessee, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
- Elsasser v. DV Trading, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.