Legal Opinion

Bruster v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 21, 1928No. A-6707PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Muskogee county for the crime of murder and his punishment fixed at death.

The information charges that on January 14, 1927, defendant killed one William Heenan by shooting him with a pistol and striking and beating him with'an ax, inflicting wounds from which he died on January 15. The evidence is that defendant is a negro, 20 years of age; that deceased, William Heenan, was a white man, 70 years of age, who conducted a small store and filling station near Muskogee. On the date charged, defendant went…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neal v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Gibson v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Carter v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Thomas v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Franklin v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wesson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Pitts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Fields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. Pruitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API