Legal Opinion

A. Lorenze Co. v. Wilbert

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 18, 1928No. 27843PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO.’Niell, C. J.

Tbe plaintiff bas appealed from a judgment dismissing tbis suit on an exception of no cause of action. Tbe suit is on a promissory note for $3,200, dated tbe 26tb of April, 1919, payable to tbe order of tbe plaintiff, A. Lorenze Company, and signed: “Penn La. Oil & Gas Co., Inc., by Erederic Wilbert, Vice President.” Tbe note is the one that was sued on in tbe case of A. (Lorenze Co. v. Penn-Louisiana Oil & Gas Co., Inc., 155 La. 749, 99 So. 586. The defendant in that suit pleaded that tbe vice president, Wilbert, was not legally authorized to sign tbe note; whereupon tbe plaintiff, by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barry v. PikeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869
  2. Trastour v. FallonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
  3. Baker v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  4. A. Lorenze Co. v. Penn-Louisiana Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Buckley v. Woodlawn Development CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  2. Neiman-Marcus Company v. ViserLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. AlwesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Tedesco v. Gentry Development, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API