Legal Opinion

Schwennen v. Abell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 19, 1991No. 90-285PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

In this comparative fault case we must decide whether the defendants are entitled to a credit for an excess payment they voluntarily made on a judgment that was subsequently reversed. The district court refused to give the defendants such a credit. We hold that the defendants were entitled to the credit. We reverse and remand with directions on this issue and on several other related issues raised by the defendants in their appeal.

In her cross-appeal the plaintiff contends she is entitled to a new trial because the district court erred in certain evidentiary rulings. In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ryan v. ArnesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. Hoekstra v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  3. Poyzer v. McGrawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  4. Reese v. Werts Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  5. Schwennen v. AbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hose v. Chicago Northwestern Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. Cedar Falls v. CEDAR FALLS SCHOOL DIST.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. Delmas R. Hose v. Chicago Northwestern Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. Doe v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  5. Jackson v. SchraderSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API