Legal Opinion

Jean Reidhead v. Joseph Meyers

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 30, 2012No. 10-16798UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Jean Reidhead, 1 Patrick Kent Reid-head, 2 and Reidhead Sand & Rock, Inc. (RS & R), (collectively the Reidheads) appeal the district court’s entry of a default judgment against them and in favor of Caribbean Financial Corporation (CFC) 3 on counterclaims that, at root, arose out of a contract dispute. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.(1) The Reidheads first claim that the district court erred when it entered a default judgment against them as a sanction. 4 We disagree.

The district court made it plain that it based its decision on its inherent power, although it also…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Alphonso Thompson v. The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Early Warning Services LLC v. Warren Vurl Johnson, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API