State Ex Rel. Derwort v. Hummel
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The respondent contends that a writ of prohibition should not be issued to prevent the execution of a ministerial act, and that the action to be taken by him in the instant case is ministerial and involves no judgment or discretion in determining whether the duty exists and he is not required or permitted to decide any question of law. In supporting that contention counsel for respondent cite State, ex rel. Voight, Jr., v. Lueders, Probate Judge, 101 Ohio St., 211, 128 N. E., 70, which held that a probate judge, acting as clerk ex officio in issuing an execution upon a judgment…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Patton v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. DuffyOhio Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Democratic Executive Committee v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- State ex rel. Pike County Republican Executive Committee v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Summit County Republican Party Executive Committee v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008