Legal Opinion

Douda v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 26, 1909PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Lirm District Court. — HoN. J. H. Peeston, Judge. ActioN to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while in the employ of defendant. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.'—

1Opinion of the Court

Ladd, J. —

Plaintiff’s employment at the time of his injury was that of cleaning out clinkers from the fire boxes of defendant’s engines in its roundhouse at Cedar Rapids. The usual method of performing this work wTas to drop the “dump” by means of a bar from outside the wheels of the engine while it was standing over the ash pit, and to replace the dumping mechanism in the same way. But in this particular instance the plaintiff thought it necessary to crawl under the engine into the ash pit in order to close the dump. He advised the “hostler” in charge of the engine, who was- in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alsever v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Kilmartin v. Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Nason v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Seymour v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. Blossi v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Isaacs v. BruceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  4. Owens v. Norwood White Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Bettinger v. Homer LoringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API