Legal Opinion

Jainchill v. Citibank, N. A.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We assume, without deciding, that plaintiff has standing to bring this action.

Plaintiff does not and cannot seriously dispute that the subject check was never presented to defendant for payment. Thus, plaintiff’s complaint, insofar as it asserted a *741cause of action against defendant for wrongfully dishonoring the check, was properly dismissed.

Liberally construed, plaintiff’s complaint also alleges a cause of action against defendant for negligence. However, inasmuch as plaintiff has not offered…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nassau Boces Central Council of Teachers v. Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. MATTER OF ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ALBANY v. New York State Dep't of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Agostino v. Monticello Greenhouses, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API