Jainchill v. Citibank, N. A.
New York Court of Appeals
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We assume, without deciding, that plaintiff has standing to bring this action.
Plaintiff does not and cannot seriously dispute that the subject check was never presented to defendant for payment. Thus, plaintiff’s complaint, insofar as it asserted a *741cause of action against defendant for wrongfully dishonoring the check, was properly dismissed.
Liberally construed, plaintiff’s complaint also alleges a cause of action against defendant for negligence. However, inasmuch as plaintiff has not offered…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Nassau Boces Central Council of Teachers v. Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- MATTER OF ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ALBANY v. New York State Dep't of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Agostino v. Monticello Greenhouses, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990