Legal Opinion

Girdler Corp. v. Charles Eneu Johnson & Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1951No. 10092PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIM, District Judge.

During World War II there was a critical shortage of carbon black, which was an essential ingredient in the manufacture of synthetic rubber. In order to increase the supply of carbon black the United States Government, through its agency, Defense Plant Corporation, entered into- a contract with Charles Eneu Johnson and Company, the defendant in this case, to design, supervise and operate a plant in New Mexico for the manufacture of carbon black out of natural gas. In order to manufacture carbon black in the required manner it was necessary to obtain from the Girdler…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. United States v. Utah, Nevada & California Stage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. United States v. Standard Rice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Darnall v. DaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  5. Stinson v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Breese Burners, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  2. SyQuia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  3. The Girdler Corporation v. Charles Eneu Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  4. In re the Accounting of WildhackNew York Surrogate's Court · 1955
  5. Oldhouser v. Stauffer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API