Legal Opinion

In Re Weinhold

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Decided March 5, 2008No. 8:94-bk-6261-PMGPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON REQUEST FOR SUPER-SEDEAS BOND AS A CONDITION TO STAY PENDING APPEAL

PAUL M. GLENN, Chief Judge.

THIS CASE came before the Court for hearing on the Motion for Stay Pending Appeal filed by Carolina Preservation Partners, Inc. (CPP) and Douglas A. Smith (Smith).

In the Motion, CPP and Smith requested a stay pending their appeal of an Order approving the Chapter 7 Trustee’s compromise with the Debtor, Wolf Arbin Weinhold.

At the hearing on the Motion, the Trustee asserted that she did not oppose the entry of a stay pending appeal, on the condition that CPP and Smith post a su-persedeas bond…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. ACC Bondholder Group v. Adelphia Communications Corp. (In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. In Re Sphere Holding Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
  3. Metz v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990
  4. Gleasman v. Jones (In Re Gleasman)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1990
  5. Culwell v. Texas Equipment Co. (In Re Texas Equipment Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re: M&C Partnership, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API