Legal Opinion

Hospelhorn v. General Motors Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 16, 1936No. [Nos. 75, 76, October Term, 1935.]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

The questions presented by the cross-appeals in this case are to be determined upon the basis of the following stipulated facts:

General Motors Corporation had a deposit account with the Baltimore Trust Company, under an agreement that, when the account exceeded such figure as the depositor should designate from time to time, the trust company would, without further instructions, telegraph the excess amount to the Guaranty Trust Company of New York for the account of General Motors Corporation with that institution. On February 17th, 19,33, a letter was mailed by General Motors Corporation to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mike Smith Pontiac, GMC, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Republic Realty Co. v. Phoenix Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. American Thrift Building & Loan Ass'n v. GimbelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  4. Republic v. PHOENIX S. & L. ASS'NCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API