Klein v. Puritan Fashions, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Commissioner.
Plaintiffs sued for and got a $10,146.21 verdict and judgment for the balance claimed due in quantum meruit for plumbing installations at defendant’s garment factory. The defendant appeals. We affirm plaintiffs’ judgment.
Plaintiffs pleaded that at defendant’s request they furnished plumbing materials and labor valued at $41,446.21, but that defendant had paid only $31,300. The defendant answered that the plaintiffs had expressly contracted to do the work for $31,300.
On trial the factual issue was whether plaintiffs had agreed to do the work for its reasonable value or…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commerce Trust Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Huttig v. BrennanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Fisher v. MiceliSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Friedman Textile Co. v. Northland Shopping Center, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Dimick v. NoonanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- J. E. Hathman, Inc. v. Sigma Alpha Epsilon Club of ColumbiaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Sampen v. DabrowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Vester J. Thompson, Jr., Inc. v. CITMOCO SERV. INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Missouri Savings Association v. Home Savings of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Landreth v. GanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.