Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Piccone

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 22, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

This is a motion under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice for summary judgment. The action was brought upon a bond by the holder of a third mortgage. The action is against defendants, the original mortgagors, who sold the property covered by the mortgage subject to the bond sued upon. There was no assumption by the purchaser from defendants of said third bond and mortgage. Thereafter the second mortgage covering these premises was foreclosed and all of the rights in said property secured by the mortgage which accompanied the bond sued upon were foreclosed and wiped out. The action upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murray v. . MarshallNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Lichtstern v. ForehandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Schieck v. DonohueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Adler v. BerkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alropa Corp. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Kenyon Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API