Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Wynne v. Quinn

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1910No. 2,765PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; Jno. B. Mc-Clernan, Judge. Quo Warranto by the state, on the relation of E. W. Wynne-, against John J. Qninn, to determine the title to the office of chief' of police of the city of Butte. From a judgment for defendant, relator appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

This is a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto, by the relator, to determine the title to the office of chief of police of the city of Butte. The complaint contains a full statement of the facts upon which the relator predicates his claim for relief. The defendant interposed a general demurrer, which the district court sustained. The relator having elected to stand upon his complaint, judgment was entered for the defendant. The appeal is from the judgment.

Butte is a city of the first class. It was created under the general laws of Montana authorizing the incorporation of cities and towns.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Quintin v. EdwardsMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State ex rel. Quintin v. EdwardsMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Dunn v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. State ex rel. Bailey v. EdwardsMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Brownell v. RussellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Clark's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State v. HoltMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State ex rel. Esgar v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Wilkinson v. La CombeMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State Ex Rel. Nagle v. the Leader Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API