Legal Opinion
McCarthy v. Manson
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 3, 1982No. Civ. H 80-263PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT
JOSE A. CABRANES, District Judge:
By a motion to alter or amend a judgment entered with the consent of both parties (styled “Motion to Open and Amend Judgment”), the Office of the Chief State’s Attorney, a part of the judicial department of the state government, seeks the reincarceration of a man released from prison by this court; the state had urged his release, pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus issued by the court, after it conceded that it had violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial.
Robert J. McCarthy was convicted of murder at a…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Robert J. McCarthy v. John Manson, Commissioner of Corrections of the State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Camardo v. General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension PlanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1992
- Wendy's International, Inc. v. Nu-Cape Construction, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
- Wider v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.